To be two
Moderna vaccine needs to be two, not one, dose, feds say
The Rule of Two was a Sith ideology created by Sith Lord Darth Bane in order for the Sith to live in secret and ultimately exact vengeance on the Jedi Order after they were nearly annihilated in the Jedi-Sith War. The law, which was influenced by the idea of a Force dyad, stipulated that only two Sith Lords should exist at any given time: a master to represent the dark side of the Force’s influence, and an apprentice to learn from the master and eventually fulfill their position. The Lords of the Sith were regulated by the philosophy of two.
The Sith doctrines revolved around the concept of a pair of Force-users even before Darth Bane established the rule.
 The masters wanted their apprentices to be loyal, but they would betray them if they found anyone with more promise.
 In the past, the Sith were often ruled by two Dark Lords at the same time, although several others lived concurrently.
 For generations, the Jedi and Sith Orders have been bitter enemies.
 The Sith’s need for dominance eventually drove them to turn on themselves,, allowing the Jedi to destroy and decimate the weak Sith millennia before the Clone Wars.
Darth Bane, on the other hand, emerged as the sole living Sith Lord. Recognizing that the Sith’s greed and infighting were to blame for their defeat, Bane invented the Rule of Two to allow the Sith to plan their retribution against the Jedi in secret.  Bane created the theory as a result of his personal experiences and research into ancient Sith documents in order to succeed the older, purer doctrine of the dyad in the Force, a special Force-bond as powerful as life itself between two Force-sensitive individuals. The Rule of Two was a pale imitation of the dyad, an unworthy yet required successor. [nine]
Feasttv live: too good to be two w/ randy & george
Luce Irigaray continues to examine a key theme in her work: the feminist redefinition of being and identity. She attempts to put the elements into intellectual debate by grounding the conversation in relation to major figures such as Sartre, Levinas, and Merleau-Ponty.
The feminist classics Speculum of the Other Woman and This Sex Which Is Not One was published by Luce Irigaray. Several of her more recent novels, including Je Tu Nous and I Love to You, are published by Routledge.
To be two : episode 2 – deuxh2o production
At the request of the Lords of Bavaria, we decree, create, and ordain that there shall be no other policy in the land, in the countryside as well as in our towns and marketplaces, than this: From Michaelmas to the Feast of St George, no mug(1) or ‘head'(2) of beer will be sold for more than one Munich penny; and from the Feast of St George to Michaelmas, no mug will be sold for more than two Munich pennies, and no head for more than three heller(3), under penalty. When brewing any beer (other than Marzenbier), however, it will never be poured or sold for more than one penny per mug. augustiner-braeu.de is a website dedicated to Augustiner Braeu.
As a result, I voted in favor of the motion, but I’d like to emphasize to you, Mr. President, and to all those who are listening to my explanation of vote right now, that I know it will be read all over the world, that the elderly and pensioners in Italy, especially those who have Party, will be delighted to be welcomed with open arms, supported, and backed once their own working lives are over.
To be two
Luce Irigaray, a French feminist philosopher, explains her theory of caress. Inter-subjectivity is not something formed above the lovers in her theory of the caress, and therefore not the vertical transcendence that Sartre perpetuated in Being and Nothingness. Love, on the other hand, is a horizontal transcendence that exists between embodied conscious beings. Her theory deconstructs many male philosophers’ alienating accounts of sexuality throughout history, liberating sexual encounters.
Luce Irigaray, a French feminist philosopher, explains her theory of caress. Inter-subjectivity is not something formed above the lovers in her theory of the caress, and therefore not the vertical transcendence that Sartre perpetuated in Being and Nothingness. Love, on the other hand, is a horizontal transcendence that exists between embodied conscious beings. Her theory deconstructs many male philosophers’ alienating accounts of sexuality throughout history, rendering sexual encounters liberating and non-hierarchical. I miss being able to research her in college!!